<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BIND Logging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.namor.ca/2009/08/05/bind-logging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.namor.ca/2009/08/05/bind-logging/</link>
	<description>Masturbation is Better when you Show it Off</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:30:27 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: lamerfreak</title>
		<link>http://blog.namor.ca/2009/08/05/bind-logging/comment-page-1/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>lamerfreak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.namor.ca/?p=102#comment-56</guid>
		<description>I believe this, as far as I know:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain_Name_System_Security_Extensions#Recursive_name_servers

&quot;The process starts when a security-aware resolver sets the &#039;DO&#039; flag bit in a DNS query. Since the DO bit is in the extended flag bits defined by EDNS, all DNSSEC transactions must support EDNS.&quot;

So it&#039;s checking for DNSSEC support on top of EDNS, if I&#039;m reading it right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe this, as far as I know:</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain_Name_System_Security_Extensions#Recursive_name_servers" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain_Name_System_Security_Extensions#Recursive_name_servers</a></p>
<p>&#8220;The process starts when a security-aware resolver sets the &#8216;DO&#8217; flag bit in a DNS query. Since the DO bit is in the extended flag bits defined by EDNS, all DNSSEC transactions must support EDNS.&#8221;</p>
<p>So it&#8217;s checking for DNSSEC support on top of EDNS, if I&#8217;m reading it right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mattias</title>
		<link>http://blog.namor.ca/2009/08/05/bind-logging/comment-page-1/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>mattias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.namor.ca/?p=102#comment-55</guid>
		<description>Did you ever figure out what the DNS_MESSAGEEXTFLAG_DO flag means?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you ever figure out what the DNS_MESSAGEEXTFLAG_DO flag means?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

